|
PS3.
Dec 8, 2006 21:26:20 GMT -5
Post by Shrikeswind on Dec 8, 2006 21:26:20 GMT -5
Blu-ray may be high-quality, but it's just a graphics enhancer to the already existant DVD player, and, since the PS3 is a game system first and foremost, that's hardly worth a crap.
|
|
D.A.N.
Buzzy Beetle
I snuck in through the ninja door.
Posts: 6
|
PS3.
Dec 9, 2006 14:05:05 GMT -5
Post by D.A.N. on Dec 9, 2006 14:05:05 GMT -5
actually IMO, Blu-ray is great. The quality is so clear, that it hurts my precious little eyes. PS3 hasn't even been using Blu Ray in any of it's games. The developers have had to use padding because they don't even know what the hell to do.
|
|
|
PS3.
Dec 17, 2006 22:35:35 GMT -5
Post by GreenLuigi on Dec 17, 2006 22:35:35 GMT -5
I think PS3 is a joke. $600 you got to be kiddings me!
|
|
|
PS3.
Dec 18, 2006 21:35:20 GMT -5
Post by HiddenTiger on Dec 18, 2006 21:35:20 GMT -5
Well, it's all but official now: The PS3 was singlehandedly the worst console launch in history. Terrible launch titles, not enough systems to meet demands, unreasonably high prices and fees for everything, blatent rip-offs of competitors technology, all the smack talk, lies, broken promises, deceptions, violence, shootings, etc. Ken Kutaragi even stepped down as CEO of SCEJ in shame because the PS3 ended up so badly. It's almost enough to make me ashamed of owning a PS2, since it ties me to Sony in even the smallest way. I just can't figure out what Sony was thinking, unless it was something like this: That's the only logical explanation. The Sony higher-ups all have stock in Nintendo!
|
|
|
PS3.
Dec 21, 2006 22:09:56 GMT -5
Post by Bestgamer1 on Dec 21, 2006 22:09:56 GMT -5
seriously?!?Or is that your opinion?
|
|
|
PS3.
Dec 23, 2006 0:33:05 GMT -5
Post by Shrikeswind on Dec 23, 2006 0:33:05 GMT -5
It seems to be a hypothesis that I would be willing to support.
|
|
|
PS3.
Dec 23, 2006 0:50:41 GMT -5
Post by Bestgamer1 on Dec 23, 2006 0:50:41 GMT -5
Same here.
|
|
D.A.N.
Buzzy Beetle
I snuck in through the ninja door.
Posts: 6
|
PS3.
Jan 7, 2007 18:12:54 GMT -5
Post by D.A.N. on Jan 7, 2007 18:12:54 GMT -5
I think PS3 is a joke. $600 you got to be kiddings me! Actually for $600, the technology you're getting is quite a bargain. It's a shame there's not alot to use it on though.
|
|
|
PS3.
Jan 9, 2007 20:21:55 GMT -5
Post by Shrikeswind on Jan 9, 2007 20:21:55 GMT -5
I guess we see the reason for said bargain.
|
|
|
PS3.
Jan 28, 2007 20:32:58 GMT -5
Post by Bestgamer1 on Jan 28, 2007 20:32:58 GMT -5
I think PS3 is a joke. $600 you got to be kiddings me! Actually for $600, the technology you're getting is quite a bargain. It's a shame there's not alot to use it on though. Still.It's a bit steep.
|
|
|
PS3.
Feb 2, 2007 20:59:42 GMT -5
Post by GreenLuigi on Feb 2, 2007 20:59:42 GMT -5
Actually for $600, the technology you're getting is quite a bargain. It's a shame there's not alot to use it on though. Still.It's a bit steep. True. When I first found out how much it was and the stuff it can do, I still to this day think it is a rip-off . I mean when the Xbox360 is a little bit of a better bargin than the PS3, but the Wii is much better.
|
|
|
PS3.
Feb 4, 2007 4:19:53 GMT -5
Post by Shrikeswind on Feb 4, 2007 4:19:53 GMT -5
Microsoft's not kicking their own ass with this. Sony's playing their Pair of Kings with an insane amount of cash on it, Microsoft's taking it low and playing their Straight on a low count. Nintendo's got the Royal Flush here, so they could do whatever they want.
Of course, I'm comparing this to a poker game, but it's a good comparison.
|
|
|
PS3.
Feb 4, 2007 15:34:43 GMT -5
Post by Bestgamer1 on Feb 4, 2007 15:34:43 GMT -5
Microsoft's not kicking their own ass with this. Sony's playing their Pair of Kings with an insane amount of cash on it, Microsoft's taking it low and playing their Straight on a low count. Nintendo's got the Royal Flush here, so they could do whatever they want. Of course, I'm comparing this to a poker game, but it's a good comparison. True. *Don't want to make it a one word post*
|
|